Previous
England U19
France U19
ESPN3 3:30 PM UTC
Game Details
Ukraine U19
Turkey U19
3:30 PM UTC
Game Details
Perth Glory
Chelsea
0
1
FT
Game Details
Valencia
Lausanne Sports
ESPN3 4:30 PM UTC Jul 24, 2018
Game Details
PSV Eindhoven
Olympiakos
5:00 PM UTC Jul 24, 2018
Game Details
Sheffield United
Internazionale
6:30 PM UTC Jul 24, 2018
Game Details
Next

More signings not the answer for Mourinho

Manchester United
Read

Alisson a boost but title talk premature at Liverpool

Liverpool
Read

Is there any future for Karius at Liverpool?

Liverpool
Read

Alisson's tough road to the top, as told by his friends

Liverpool
Read

Martial, Chong impress in Man United draw with America

Manchester United
Read

Man United's five most pressing preseason concerns

Manchester United
Read

Thibaut Courtois crisis Chelsea's own doing

Chelsea
Read

Arsenal ultimatum over Ramsey: Sign contract or be sold

Arsenal
Read

Sarri presents himself as the anti-Conte

Chelsea
Read

Alisson would be a major statement for Liverpool

Liverpool
Read

Man United need to show Rashford he has a future

Manchester United
Read

Virgil van Dijk's failed transfer has not benefited Liverpool, Southampton

With Nathaniel Clyne reportedly set to be sidelined for three more months, how will Liverpool and England cope without him?

A reunion that barely reunites anyone sounds an unsuccessful affair. As there are times when Liverpool's scouting policy has seemed to consist of buying a season ticket at St Mary's, Saturday's game against Southampton ought to be a get-together of familiar faces. But injuries mean that Nathaniel Clyne will not feature and Adam Lallana and Sadio Mane might not. While former Liverpool defender Mauricio Pellegrino is now Southampton manager, Dejan Lovren could be the lone man actually playing against a former club. 

And even he would have stood a lesser chance of starting had Virgil van Dijk become the latest to take the increasingly familiar path from the banks of the Solent to Merseyside. Instead, it is the reunion that isn't. Van Dijk did not join Liverpool. He did not become the most expensive defender ever, as a mooted price of at least £60 million would have made him.

LiverpoolLiverpool
SouthamptonSouthampton
3
0
FT
Game Details

He submitted a transfer request. Liverpool had already submitted an apology after Southampton alleged they had tapped up the Dutchman. Van Dijk apparently met Jurgen Klopp in Blackpool, a favourite holiday destination of Bill Shankly's but a place the Reds have only needed to visit once for footballing reasons -- a 2-1 defeat in 2011 -- in 47 years.

So this promises to be an awkward occasion for suitor and the object of their affections alike, a chance for each to see what they could have had. Because, three months into the season, it is hard to see that anyone has benefited from Southampton's refusal to sell: not the Saints, even though they have a fine defensive record; nor Liverpool, who certainly do not; and not Van Dijk, who seems a man in limbo. 

This is not a repeat of Mane's move, a deal that benefited Liverpool and a player who took his game to another level, but cost Southampton, who lost incision and excitement with his departure. Nor is it a sequel of Lovren's departure, when Southampton banked £20m and posted a significantly better defensive record in the first season after the Croatian's exit.

Liverpool are set to make Virgil van Dijk the most expensive defender ever.
Virgil van Dijk's failed transfer has had negative implications for all parties involved.

Instead, Liverpool have the sixth-worst defensive record in the division. They have kept clean sheets of late but against unambitious opponents, in Maribor and Huddersfield. They have also let in three goals to Watford, four to Tottenham and five to Manchester City. The manner has been as dispiriting as the numbers and if the structural failings and set-piece difficulties mean it is simplistic to suggest one player would have been a panacea for all their problems, it is evident Liverpool required a top-class centre-back more than, say, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. The 4-1 evisceration by Spurs is the sort of result that could ultimately cost Liverpool a top-four finish.

Lovren's harrowing afternoon at Wembley, where he was substituted after half an hour after having been directly at fault for two Spurs goals, represented the nadir, but it was far from the only issue. Ragnar Klavan was little better in the 5-0 thrashing at City. The left half of defence, usually staffed by Lovren and Alberto Moreno, is a weak link. It has not helped that Lovren has been playing in pain, nor that Klopp's tactics, with a high defensive line and full-backs who double up as wingers, mean his centre-backs have to be able to defend one on one. Van Dijk allies the speed to cope with presence and conviction, two things Lovren sometimes lacks. At his best, he exerts a magnetic effect on the ball.

Not that Southampton have seen Van Dijk at his commanding, confident best. They have conceded every 75 minutes with him on the pitch, and every 107 without him. He gave away a penalty in the defeat at Stoke. He has been a complication when Pellegrino perhaps wanted to move on. The £15m summer signing Wesley Hoedt has been dropped to make way for Van Dijk; so, too, the in-form Maya Yoshida, the other half of the potential partnership of the future.

He is a superior player to either but Southampton do not need a £60m centre-back. A side with nine goals in 11 league games require more firepower and a greater threat in the final third. A team who have failed to score six times already this season over all competitions perhaps could have profited from investing a windfall in a striker and a creator.    

It is understandable if Van Dijk saw the precedents and assumed Southampton would cash in on him, just as it is logical that Saints wanted to shed their image as a selling club. But that is easier said than done, and they perhaps picked the wrong player. Van Dijk is 26; his value may soon decrease if they do not sell, while Southampton have slipped down the standings with him. If keeping him was a statement of ambition, the league table makes a different kind of declaration.

But buying him would have remedied a weakness at Anfield and enhanced their chances of making Champions League qualification an annual event. Liverpool have had cause to rue the ones who got away before. They have had seasons that were defined by players they lost, whether it be Xabi Alonso in 2009-10 or Luis Suarez in 2014-15, but rarely by one they never signed to begin with. But that is the worst-case scenario. This could be remembered as Van Dijk's year at Anfield. Just not in the way Liverpool envisaged.

Richard Jolly covers the Premier League and Champions League for ESPN FC. Twitter: @RichJolly.

Comments

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your Facebook name, photo & other personal information you make public on Facebook will appear with your comment, and may be used on ESPN's media platforms. Learn more.